Komparasi Daya Dukung Bored Pile: Metode Analitis Vs PDA Test

Authors

  • Frido L. Tangga Politeknik Negeri Manado
  • Jeanely Rangkang Politeknik Negeri Manado
  • Vicky A. Assa Politeknik Negeri Manado

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/koloni.v5i3.1271

Keywords:

Bored Pile, Ultimate Bearing Capacity, Meyerhof, Reese and Wright, PDA.

Abstract

Foundations serve as substructure elements that support and transfer loads from the superstructure to the underlying soil layers. Boredpiles are a type of deep foundation constructed by drilling the soil, installing reinforcement cages, and subsequently casting concrete into thebored holes. This study aims to calculate and compare the ultimate bearing capacity under existing conditions based on Pile Driving Analyzer(PDA) Test data with analytical calculations using Cone Penetration Test (CPT), Standard Penetration Test (N-SPT), and laboratory data. Thebearing capacity was calculated using the Meyerhof method based on CPT and laboratory data, while the Reese and Wright method wasapplied using N-SPT data. The comparison results indicate that all analytical calculations yielded lower ultimate bearing capacities than the PDA Test result. The PDA Test indicated an ultimate bearing capacity of 241.8 tons. Meanwhile, the Meyerhof method using CPT data resultedin an ultimate bearing capacity of 163 tons, representing a 33% difference from the PDA Test result. The Meyerhof method using laboratory data yielded an ultimate bearing capacity of 117 tons, with a 52% difference from the PDA Test result. Furthermore, the Reese and Wrightmethod using N-SPT data resulted in an ultimate bearing capacity of 64 tons, representing a 73% difference from the PDA Test result. Based onthe comparison of the ultimate bearing capacities obtained using different methods and data sources, the Meyerhof method using CPT dataproduced the result closest to the field test result obtained from the PDA Test.

References

Aziz, Z. A., & Yogaswara, D. (2025a). Perbandingan Daya Dukung Pondasi Bored Pile Hasil Uji SPT dan Uji PDA pada Abutment Jembatan Fly Over Kopo Bandung. Jurnal Konstruksi, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.33364/konstruksi/v.23-2.1985

Benedict, K., Junior, O., & Desiani, A. (2026). Evaluasi Perbandingan Daya Dukung Tiang Bor Metode Analisis Reese dan Allpile Terhadap Hasil Uji PDA. Jurnal Sosial Dan Teknologi (SOSTECH), 6(2).

Das. (2016). Principles of Foundation Engineering.

Fajar Maulana, W., & Nono Suhana, dan. (2025). Analisis Daya Dukung Pondasi Tiang Bor Tunggal Menggunak An Metode Analitis Dan Metode Elemen Hingga.

Hardiyatmo. (2011). Analisis & Perancangan Fondasi.

Mahmudi, A., Tirta Hartoni Putri, M., & Wardoyo, T. (2023). Analisa Perbandingan Daya Dukung Pondasi Bored Pile Berdasarkan Data Sondir Dan Pile Driving Analyzer Test Pada Proyek Pengembangan Gedung J Universitas Kristen Petra Surabaya. INTER TECH, 1(2), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.54732/i.v1i2.1051

Noviyona Br Surbakti, O. :, Simanjuntak, D., Endayanti, M., Gultom, A., Universitas, ), & Agung, D. (2025). Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil Analisa Daya Dukung Pondasi Pada Proyek Tangki 5000 Kl Di Dppu Pertamina Kualanamu.

https://jurnal.darmaagung.ac.id/index.php/tekniksipil/issue/archive

Nurul Fadilah, U., Tunafiah, H., & Halimah Tunafiah, I. (2018). Analisa Daya Dukung Pondasi Bored Pile Berdasarkan Data N-Spt Menurut Rumus Reese&Wright Dan Penurunan.

Pribadi, G., Prima, Y., & Rumbyarso, A. (2023). Jurnal Teslink : Teknik Sipil Dan Lingkungan Analisis Perbandingan Daya Dukung Dan Penurunan Pondasi Tiang Bor Dengan Perhitungan Manual Dan Software Allpile. 5(2), 16–20. Https://Doi.Org/10.52005/Teslink.V115i1.Xxx

Rahman, A., Sitepu, H., Nofria Riska, D., Putra, R. H., Kurniawan, R., Saputra, C. A., Syuhada, S., Hayati, J., Utami, T., Sipil, T., Kewilayahan, D., Sumatera, T., Ryacudu, J. T., Hui, W., Agung, J., & Selatan, L. (2024). Analisis Daya Dukung Tiang Bor Menggunakan Metode Empirik Dari Data Pengujian Sondir (Vol. 10).

Rosyta, H. A., & Candra, A. I. (2026). Peningkatan Akurasi Perhitungan Kapasitas Dukung Pondasi Strauss Melalui Integrasi Profil Diameter Aktual Sepanjang Tiang. Jurnal Talenta Sipil, 9(1),

Https://Doi.Org/10.33087/Talentasipil.V9i1.1218

Setiawan Jurusan, A., Studi Teknik Sipil, P., Teknik, F., Palangka Raya Jln Hendrik Timang, U., Raya, P., Alexsander, S., Raya Jln Hendrik Timang, P., Sarie, F., Gandi, S., & Hendri, O. (2023).

Analisis Pondasi Bored Pile Pada Struktur Tugu Talawang Di Bundaran Besar

Palangka Raya. In Oktober (Vol. 7, Number 1).

Sinta Oktavioni, S., Mindiastiwi, T., & Siswanto, A. B. (2025). Perbandingan Daya Dukung Pondasi Bored Pile Menggunakan Perhitungan Manual, Software Allpile Dan Test Pda. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 18(2), 287–298. Https://Jurnal2.Untagsmg.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Jts

Sni 8460: 2017. (2017). " Badan Standardisasi Nasional Standar Nasional Indonesia Persyaratan Perancangan Geoteknik. Www.Bsn.Go.Id

Surya Darmawan, F., & Indah Sari, K. (2022). Analisis Daya Dukung Pondasi Bored Pile Diameter 0,8 M Pada Proyek Gedung Menara Bri Jalan Putri Hijau, Medan. In

Cetak) Buletin Utama Teknik (Vol. 18, Number 1). Online.

Downloads

Published

15-09-2026

How to Cite

Tangga, F. L., Rangkang, J., & Assa, V. A. (2026). Komparasi Daya Dukung Bored Pile: Metode Analitis Vs PDA Test. KOLONI, 5(3), 2516–2524. https://doi.org/10.31004/koloni.v5i3.1271