Optimizing Talent Management Practices: a Case Study of PT X’S Head Office in Indonesia’s Forestry Sector

Authors

  • Anisa Irbah Bandung Institute of Technology
  • Andika Putra Pratama Bandung Institute of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/koloni.v5i3.1012

Keywords:

equity, talent management, organizational justice, HRIS, forestry sector

Abstract

Structural inequality in talent management is increasingly recognized as a systemic barrier to organizational sustainability, particularly in industries operating in geographically dispersed and socially diverse environments. This study examines how the implementation of structural equity inthe talent management cycle—encompassing recruitment, placement, career development, promotion, and succession planning—is appliedat a company in the forestry sector. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews with elevenkey informants from various organizational levels, supplemented by document analysis and field observations. The findings reveal that structuralequity has not been fully realized, stemming from the absence of an integrated Human Resources Information System (HRIS) and a lack of formalized career paths. These conditions result in unequal access to career development opportunities, perpetuate a cycle of talent stagnation, and impact long-term workforce sustainability. Based on Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM), organizational justice theory,and stakeholder theory, this study proposes a three-phase intervention framework centered on equity: (1) implementation of an integratedHRIS as a data foundation, (2) establishment of individual KPIs and a formalized career path structure, and (3) development of structured communication mechanisms and a culture of transparency. These findings contribute to the scholarly discourse on equity in HRM within the context of organizations operating in resource -intensive sectors.

References

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299.

Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (2006). Strategic human resources management: Where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 32(6), 898–925.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Collings, D. G., & Mellahi, K. (2009). Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda.

*Human Resource Management Review*, 19(4), 304–313.

Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Dries, N., & González-Cruz, T. F. (2015). What is the meaning of ‘talent’ in the world of work? Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 290–300.

Kalla, R., et al. (2025). Equitable HR systems and employee commitment in geographically dispersed organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mor Barak, M. E. (2016). Managing diversity: Toward a globally inclusive workplace (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Prakoso, A., et al. (2025). Green human resource management, diversity and inclusion, and organizational effectiveness. Sustainability.

Schuler, R. S. (1992). Strategic human resources management: Linking the people with the strategic needs of the business. Organizational Dynamics, 21(1), 18–32.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

30-07-2026

How to Cite

Irbah, A., & Pratama, A. P. (2026). Optimizing Talent Management Practices: a Case Study of PT X’S Head Office in Indonesia’s Forestry Sector. KOLONI, 5(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.31004/koloni.v5i3.1012