Enhancing Production Performance Through Assembly Line Balancing: A Case Study Of A Motorcycle Final Assembly Line At Pt Rivercape Indonesia

Authors

  • Rais Akbar 'Alim Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Akbar Adhi Utama Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/koloni.v5i3.1210

Keywords:

physical ergonomics, work comfort, simple linear regression, work environment, productivity

Abstract

PT Rivercape Indonesia has been failing to meet its annual production target of 23,000 units on Final Assembly Line F1, with actual output reaching only 20,667 units and an estimated revenue gap of USD 7,821,288.71. This study aims to identify the root cause of this shortfall, formulate improvement alternatives, and select the most appropriate alternative using an Assembly Line Balancing (ALB) approach supported by a Current Reality Tree (CRT) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The research method combined direct observation, focus group discussions, and internal company data collected from January to February 2026. The existing-condition analysis shows that the line operates with 26 workstations and a cycle time of 335 seconds, resulting in a Line Efficiency of only 74.39% and a Balance Delay of 25.61% (categorized as bad according to Yin, 2016). CRT analysis confirmed the root cause as the absence of a mechanism to optimize workstation utilization. Three improvement alternatives were evaluated against a target cycle time of 301 seconds: Alternative 1 (TSALBP Type 2) achieved a Line Efficiency of 82.79%; Alternative 2 (TSALBP Type 1) achieved the most substantial improvement, with a Line Efficiency of 93.90% across 23 workstations; and Alternative 3 (UALBP) achieved a Line Efficiency of 93.59% with a U-shaped layout. Using AHP with a Consistency Ratio of 0.011, Alternative 2 was selected as the most preferred strategy with the highest composite score of 0.500. Implementation of the selected alternative is projected to recover approximately USD 6.42 million of the existing revenue gap through a four-phase, nine-month implementation plan.

References

Battaïa, O., & Dolgui, A. (2013). A taxonomy of line balancing problems and their solution approaches. International Journal of Production Economics, 142(2), 259-277.

Boysen, N., Fliedner, M., & Scholl, A. (2008). Assembly line balancing: Which model to use when? International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 509-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.026

Boysen, N., Schulze, P., & Scholl, A. (2022). Assembly line balancing: What happened in the last fifteen years? European Journal of Operational Research, 301(3), 797-814.

Brunelli, M. (2015). Introduction to the analytic hierarchy process. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12502-2

Dettmer, H. W. (1997). Goldratt's theory of constraints: A systems approach to continuous improvement. ASQ Quality Press.

Groover, M. P. (2014). Automation, production systems, and computer-integrated manufacturing (4th ed.). Pearson.

Indonesian Motorcycle Industry Association. (2026). AISI reveals the 2025 motorcycle market and 2026 forecast. https://www.aisi.or.id/aisi-ungkap-pasar-sepeda-motor-2025-dan-prediksi-tahun-2026/

Kim, Y. K., Kim, Y., & Kim, Y. J. (2000). Two-sided assembly line balancing: A genetic algorithm approach. Production Planning & Control, 11(1), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/095372800232478

Ministry of Industry of the Republic of Indonesia. (2025, February 13). Manufacturing industry's contribution to GDP refutes the deindustrialization issue [Press statement]. https://www.niaga.asia/kontribusi-industri-manufaktur-terhadap-pdb-patahkan-isu-deindustrialisasi/

Miltenburg, J., & Wijngaard, J. (1994). The U-line line balancing problem. Management Science, 40(10), 1378-1388. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.10.1378

MotorCyclesData. (2026, May 6). Global motorcycles market: Data & fact 2026. https://www.motorcyclesdata.com/2026/05/06/world-motorcycles-market/

Oksuz, M. K., Buyukozkan, K., & Satoglu, S. I. (2017). U-shaped assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem: A mathematical model and two meta-heuristics. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 112, 246-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.030

Özcan, U., & Toklu, B. (2009). Balancing of mixed-model two-sided assembly lines. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57(1), 217-227.

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill.

Sink, D. S., & Tuttle, T. C. (1989). Planning and measurement in your organization of the future. Industrial Engineering and Management Press.

Tangen, S. (2005). Demystifying productivity and performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(1), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400510571437

Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028

World Bank. (2025). Manufacturing, value added (% of GDP) - Indonesia [Data set]. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.IND.MANF.ZS?locations=ID

Yin, M., & Jiang, W. (2016). The theory of IE assembly line balance and optimization. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Machinery, Materials, Environment, Biotechnology and Computer (MMEBC 2016) (pp. 1778-1782). Atlantis Press.

Downloads

Published

05-09-2026

How to Cite

’Alim, R. A., & Utama, A. A. (2026). Enhancing Production Performance Through Assembly Line Balancing: A Case Study Of A Motorcycle Final Assembly Line At Pt Rivercape Indonesia. KOLONI, 5(3), 2381–2386. https://doi.org/10.31004/koloni.v5i3.1210