Representasi Nilai Persatuan Berdasarkan Sila Ketiga Pancasila Dalam Tradisi Sekaten Di Keraton Kasunanan Surakarta Hadiningrat

Authors

  • Wisnu Aditya Candrakristawan Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Widya Noventari Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Yudi Ariana Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/koloni.v5i4.1520

Keywords:

Civic Education (PPKN), Local Culture, Pancasila, Sekaten, Unity Values.

Abstract

The study aims to (1) analyze the representation of the value of unity based on the third principle of Pancasila in the procession of the Sekaten tradition and (2) identify its supporting and inhibiting factors. This study employed a qualitative method with a descriptive approach and was conducted at the Kasunanan Surakarta Hadiningrat Palace. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation involving eleven informants comprising palace relatives (sentono dalem), palace servants (abdi dalem), religious leaders, government representatives, traders, and visitors. Data were analyzed using an interactive model consisting of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that, first, the value of unity in the Sekaten tradition is represented through cultural symbols, rituals, and social interactions involving various segments of society regardless of their backgrounds. This value is reflected in togetherness, tolerance, mutual cooperation, and collective participation throughout the various stages of the procession. Second, the supporting factors for the representation of the value of unity include the active role of the Palace, government support, and community participation. Meanwhile, the inhibiting factors include the influence of globalization, limited understanding of cultural values among the younger generation, and the dominance of entertainment aspects in the implementation of Sekaten. The study concludes that the Sekaten tradition functions not only as a cultural ritual but also as a means of internalizing the value of unity in accordance with the third principle of Pancasila, as well as a source of culturally based learning for Pancasila and Civic Education.

References

Anggraini, L., & Chodidjah, S. (2023). Pengaruh wisata edukasi, niat perilaku, dan lokasi niat berkunjung ulang ke Taman Ismail Marzuki Jakarta. Human Capital Development, 10(2), 1–17. https://ejournal.asaindo.ac.id/index.php/hcd/article/view/2468

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. PT Bina Aksara.

Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila (BPIP). (2021). Materi dasar pembinaan ideologi Pancasila.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik pemuda Indonesia. Badan Pusat Statistik.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.

Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life. The Free Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775357

Dinas Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata Kota Surakarta. (2022). Kompilasi data profil.

Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. McGraw-Hill.

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.

Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage.

Herusatoto, B. (2008). Simbolisme dalam budaya Jawa. Hanindita Graha Widya.

Idza Adzan Ponulele, M., Faizullah, M. Y. M., & Tri Astuti, H. (2023). Tradisi Sekaten dalam pandangan santri milenial. Musala: Jurnal Pesantren dan Kebudayaan Islam Nusantara, 2(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.37252/jpkin.v2i1.516

Iba, Z., & Wardhana, A. (2023). Metode penelitian.

Kaelan. (2013). Negara kebangsaan Pancasila: Historis, kultural, filosofis, yuridis, dan aktualisasinya. Paradigma.

Koentjaraningrat. (2009). Pengantar ilmu antropologi. Rineka Cipta.

Latif, Y. (2018). Identitas keindonesiaan dan aktualisasi Pancasila bagi generasi milenial di era digital. Jurnal Kajian Lemhannas RI, 33, 5–19.

Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Free Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Notonagoro. (1997). Pancasila: Secara ilmiah populer. Bumi Aksara.

Parsons, T. (1991). The social system. Routledge. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=FEWj6qIiXcQC

Purwadi. (2005). Upacara tradisional Jawa: Menggali untaian kearifan lokal. Pustaka Pelajar.

Rahayu, N. T., & Suryono, J. (2020). Traditional and digital media: Cultural communication mix in Sekaten tradition. Proceedings of the International Conference on Community Development (ICCD), 477, 564–567. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201017.125

Saleh, S. (2023). Mengenal penelitian kualitatif: Panduan bagi peneliti pemula. Badan Penerbit UNM.

Sidiq, U., & Choiri, M. M. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif di bidang pendidikan. http://repository.iainponorogo.ac.id/484/1/

Sudaryono. (2019). Metodologi penelitian: Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan mix method. Rajawali Pers.

Sugiyono. (2024). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Aldine Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134666

Ulfatin, N. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif di bidang pendidikan: Teori dan aplikasinya. Media Nusa Creative.

UNESCO. (2003). 2003 Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2018). Culture in a globalized world

Downloads

Published

29-10-2026

How to Cite

Candrakristawan, W. A., Noventari, W., & Ariana, Y. (2026). Representasi Nilai Persatuan Berdasarkan Sila Ketiga Pancasila Dalam Tradisi Sekaten Di Keraton Kasunanan Surakarta Hadiningrat. KOLONI, 5(4), 4975–4994. https://doi.org/10.31004/koloni.v5i4.1520